MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159308542 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076668

Expanded Neo-Fuzzy Adaptive Decayed Brain Emotional Learning Network for Online Time Series Predication

2021· article· en· W3159308542 on OpenAlexafffund
Houssen S. A. Milad, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceMean squared errorMachine learningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Neo-Fuzzy integrated Adaptive Decayed Brain Emotional Learning (NF-ADBEL) network has recently been proposed for online time series predicting problems. The NF-ADBEL network is suitable for online time series prediction with shorter update intervals and offers features such as fast learning, accuracy, simplicity, and lower computational complexity. However, the neo-fuzzy neuron network in NF-ADBEL was integrated only in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) part of the ADBEL network. This paper aims to further improve the performance of the NF-ADBEL network by integrating the neo-fuzzy neuron network into the amygdala (AMY) section as well, inspired by a fully integrated version of a neo-fuzzy-based pattern recognizer. As is known, the AMY has two outputs: one response is based on imprecise information received from the thalamus, and the second response is based on information received from the sensory cortex. In this study, the imprecise response generation is operated as previously, while the other AMY process is treated by neo-fuzzy neurons. The resultant network is called Expanded Neo-Fuzzy integrated Adaptive Decayed Brain Emotional Learning (ENF-ADBEL). The modified network is still simple and meets the requirement for online prediction problems. A few chaotic and stochastic nonlinear systems, namely the Mackey-Glass, Lorenz, Rossler, disturbance storm time index, Narendra dynamic plant identification, wind speed and wind power series, are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed network in terms of the root mean squared error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (COR) criteria in a MATLAB programming environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207