MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159339510 · doi:10.4000/rbnu.1852

W comme WINSTUBS

2014· article· fr· W3159339510 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Oberlé

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Revue de la BNU · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Aesthetics, and Perception
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bilder aus vergangener Zeit se compose de quarante lithographies, realisees par Leo Schnug (1878-1933) entre 1900 et 1909. La BNU possede deux exemplaires de l’ouvrage. Preface par le peintre et critique d’art Theodor Knorr, il parait en 1909 chez Julius Manias (1866-1944). Ce n'est pas la premiere collaboration entre les deux hommes. Des 1904, Schnug dessine une serie de cartes postales editees par Manias. Ce dernier, imprimeur et editeur originaire de Kehl, fonde en 1891 a Strasbourg la Gra...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2890.104

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Revue de la BNUSame topicArt, Aesthetics, and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207