MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159339636 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1494

Serum Concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 Across the Menstrual Cycle

2021· article· en· W3159339636 on OpenAlexaffabout
Angelique H. Riepsamen, Mark W. Donoghoe, Angela Baerwald, Michaël W. Pankhurst, Shelly Lien, Yih Harng Chong, David Robertson, Robert B. Gilchrist

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone morphogenetic protein 15Menstrual cycleOvulationGrowth differentiation factor-9Luteal phaseFolliculogenesisFecundityOvarian reserveFollicular phaseEndocrinologyOvarian follicleInternal medicineBiologyAndrologyPhysiologyMedicineInfertilityPregnancyPopulationHormoneBone morphogenetic proteinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF9) and bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP15) are TGF-β proteins that regulate key processes throughout folliculogenesis and are determinants of mammalian fecundity (1). They are uniquely produced predominantly by the oocyte and have potential clinical application as markers of oocyte quality and quantity (2). However, no studies have been conducted to assess whether serum concentrations alter across the different phases of the menstrual cycle, and thus if assessment should be confined to specific cycle stages. The aim of this study was to measure serum concentrations of these proteins during the menstrual cycle in women at different stages of reproductive life. Serum was collected every 1-3 days throughout the menstrual cycle from 41 healthy ovulatory women from three cohorts: menses to late luteal phase (21-29 years of age; n=16; University of Otago) and across one interovulatory interval (18-35 years of age; n=10; and 45-50 years of age; n=15; University of Saskatchewan), with simultaneous ultrasound scans confirming ovulation. Serum concentrations of GDF9, BMP15, estradiol, FSH, LH, progesterone, inhibin A and B and AMH were measured. GDF9 and BMP15 were detectable in 54% and 73% of women and varied 236- and 52-fold between women, respectively. To detect changes, mean concentrations and variances across the cycle were statistically modelled using a generalized additive model of location, shape and scale (GAMLSS). Across the menstrual cycle, there were minimal changes in serum GDF9 or BMP15 within a woman for all cohorts, with no significant differences detected in modelled mean concentrations. However, modelled variances were highest in the luteal phases of all women for BMP15 immediately following ovulation, regardless of age, suggesting a possible underlying cyclic pattern. These results suggest that serum BMP15 and GDF9 are not overtly affected by menstrual cycle dynamics but may be more stable in the follicular phase. Larger studies with more frequent sampling should establish if BMP15 and presumably GDF9 demonstrate clinically relevant cyclic variation. References: (1) Gilchrist RB et al., HRU 2008; 14:159-77. (2) Riepsamen AH et al., Endocrinol 2019; 160:2298-313.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicGDF15 and Related BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207