Development of Machine Vision to Increase the Level of Automation in Indonesia Electronic Component Industry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human involvement in the assembly part manufacturing process is still relatively high. However, automation solutions are not flexible enough to be applied to manufacturing systems. It is essential to evaluate each work activity so that automation can be implemented effectively. We developed an automatic vision inspection using machine vision. The level of automation (LoA) in the company increases, and the impact caused by process failures on manual systems can be eliminated during inspection activities. The automation level increase in the inspection area is described and analyzed using the Hierarchy Task Analysis (HTA). Inspection data process activity and quality data are collected to determine the CCD camera selection, lamp selection, and lens selection. Three quality objectives, such as geometric quality, surface quality, and structural quality, are identified automatically using machine vision. Furthermore, after applying machine vision, an analysis of current LoA conditions and future LoA conditions is carried out. The results showed that the application of machine vision could increase the Level of Automation in the product inspection activity by 81.8%. There is a strong correlation (R = 0.924) between manual measurements carried out by operators and machine vision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it