Detecting potholes in asphalt pavement under small-sample conditions based on improved faster region-based convolution neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pavement potholes have low detection accuracy under the condition of small samples. To address this issue, we propose a method for efficient and accurate pothole detection under small-sample conditions based on an improved Faster R-CNN (Region-based Convolution Neural Networks). First, images consisting of different pothole shapes and sizes were acquired from different sources and then augmented and denoised to obtain an image set. Second, two representative target-detection models, Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3, were tested. The detection results indicate that Faster R-CNN achieves better detection performance. Furthermore, to overcome inconsistencies (missed detections and inaccurate position estimations), the feature extraction layers of VGG16, ZFNet, and ResNet50 networks were used in combination with Faster R-CNN. The results showed that the VGG16+Faster R-CNN fusion model yielded superior accuracy. Finally, the detection accuracy improved to 0.8997 after adjusting the size of the candidate frame, which also enabled successful detection of previously missed targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".