MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3159395751

CH 4 sink capacity across the geodiversity of Arctic drylands and extreme soils

2018· article· en· W3159395751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jesper Riis Christiansen, Tue Mariager

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodiversitySoil waterArcticSink (geography)Environmental scienceThe arcticSoil scienceGeographyPhysical geographyGeologyOceanographyEcologyCartographyBiodiversityBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using atmospheric methane (CH4), certain soil microbes are able to sustain their metabolism, and in turn remove this powerful greenhouse gas from the atmosphere. Recent studies have demonstrated the occurrence of CH4 consumption in upland dry tundra soils in Arctic and High Arctic environments. Oxidation of CH4 in these cold, dry soils in the Arctic region can counteract CH4 emissions from Arctic wetlands and thereby play a potential important role for the net Arctic CH4 exchange budget. Currently, knowledge gaps exist on the overall magnitude of the net CH4 sink in these cold, dry systems as the spatial and environmental limits for CH4 oxidation is unknown. In particular, the extent, magnitude and drivers of CH4 oxidation in mountains and alpine landforms, which occupy large land areas in the Arctic and High Arctic has not yet been investigated leaving a potentially vast CH4 sink unquantified with major potential implications for our conceptual view of Arctic CH4 budget in both a past, present and future changing climate. To address this important knowledge gap and identify the most relevant spatial scaling parameters, we studied in situ CH4 net exchange across several large landscape transects in West Greenland as well as in Alpine landscapes in the Yukon Territory, Arctic Canada. The aim of the research was to quantify the variation in flux magnitude and determine the spatial extent of net uptake of atmospheric CH4 across a variety of previously unexplored dry tundra and post-glacial landforms in the Arctic. Our results show a persistent net uptake of CH4 uptake in these dry, extreme environments that rival the sink strength observed in temperate forest soils, otherwise considered the primary global terrestrial sink of atmospheric CH4. Quite surprisingly, we found high CH4 sink rates in conditions when soils were both extremely thin (< 10 cm to bedrock), very dry (< 5-10 % soil moisture), weakly developed and exposed to harsh environmental conditions such as mountain tops, alpine tundra and abrasion plateaus, which are historically overlooked “extreme soils” regarding CH4 exchange. The results show that the physical areas and landforms where CH4 oxidation and net CH4 deposition occurs has not been delimited for the Arctic and calls for further studies of the spatiotemporal nature and occurrence of the CH4 sink across the Arctic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→