Artificial Neural Network Performance Boost using Probabilistic Recovery with Fast Cascade Training
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pattern Recognition and Classification is considered one of the most promising applications in the scientific field of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). However, regardless of the vast scientific advances in almost every aspect of the technology and mathematics, neural networks still need to be fairly large and complex (i.e., deep), in order to provide robust results. In this article, we propose a novel ANN architecture approach that aims to combine two fairly small Neural Networks based on an introduced probability term of correct classification. Additionally, we present a second ANN, used to reclassify the potentially incorrect results by using the most probable error-free results as additional training data with the predicted labels. The proposed method achieves a rapid decrease in the mean square error compared to other large and complex ANN architectures with a similar execution time. Our approach demonstrates increased effectiveness when applied to various databases, related to wine, iris, the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) database, the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (Cifar32), and Fashion MNIST classification problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it