MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159396611 · doi:10.30883/jba.v24i1.899

Model Pemanfaatan Bangunan Tradisional Jawa Sebagai Salah Satu Objek Wisata Budaya (Kasus di Kampung Kauman Yogyakarta)

2004· article· id· W3159396611 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Chawari

Bibliographic record

VenueBerkala Arkeologi · 2004
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nama "Kauman" berarti tempat berdiamnya sekelompok ahli agama, di mana kampung tersebut berkaitan erat dengan keberadaan Kraton Kasultanan Yogyakarta. Kraton ini berdiri sekitar tahun 1755, berpatokan terjadinya perjanjian Giyanti yang membagi Kerajaan Mataram menjadi dua, yaitu Kasultanan Yogyakarta dan Kasunanan Surakarta. Sementara itu, berdirinya Kampung Kauman tidak jauh berbeda waktunya dengan pendirian Kraton Yogyakarta tersebut, sebab Masjid Besar yang terletak di Kampung Kauman didirikan pada tahun 1773. Dengan demikian keberadaan kampung ini tentunya tidak berbeda jauh dengan berdirinya Masjid Besar tersebut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBerkala ArkeologiSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207