Helicopter Rotor Ice Shedding and Trajectory Analyses in Forward Flight
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ice accretion on a helicopter’s aerodynamic surfaces during flight can lead to incidents and fatal accidents. An iced helicopter blade results in a decrease in stall angle, an increase in required torque, as well as potential damage from shed ice. While the high centrifugal forces on a rotor may serve as a natural deicing mechanism, they can also lead to uneven ice shedding, causing rotor imbalances or hitting other blades, the fuselage, or the tail rotor. Computational methods are important for predicting in-flight ice formation and are a vital tool in the design of ice protection systems. The objective of this paper is to present a computationally inexpensive methodology to determine for a helicopter in forward flight, following a period of ice accretion, rotor ice crack locations, shedding times, and potential impact zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it