MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159437153 · doi:10.18192/jpp.v15i2.5368

Two More Black Activists Resist and are Jailed: October 5, 2005

2007· article· en· W3159437153 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claude Marks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prisoners on Prisons · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistPolitical scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A San Francisco Judge had two Black activists jailed today for refusing to co-operate with a State Grand Jury investigating a 30 year old case.Ray Boudreaux and Richard Brown now join Hank Jones and Harold Taylor in SF County jails.Their attorneys argued that the Grand Jury procedures were abusive because the original indictments for a police shooting in 1971 resulted in the dismissal of charges because the US government failed to disclose that their "evidence" was obtained by torturing at least three Black activists in New Orleans.This "tainted evidence" and "involuntary testimony" were introduced to a grand jury at that time by the same government agents that are working with the current grand jury.Judge Robert Dondero refused to allow the defense questioning of Ed Erdelatz, one of the cops on hand in New Orleans, who was present in court today, and who has been roaming the country in an apparent attempt to interview numerous individuals alleged to be involved with or have knowledge of the 1970s incidents.All other motions by defense attorneys Michael Burt and Richard Mazer were denied.An appeal to the State Supreme Court challenging procedural and other legal claims by the defense team are expected to be fi led Thursday, October 6th.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0200.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prisoners on PrisonsSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207