MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159437800 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2021.3076409

Carrier Aggregation With Optimized UE Power Consumption in 5G

2021· article· en· W3159437800 on OpenAlexaff
Roghayeh Joda, Medhat Elsayed, Hatem Abou-Zeid, Ramy Atawia, Akram Bin Sediq, Gary Boudreau, Melike Erol‐Kantarci

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroughputComputer scienceUser equipmentQuality of servicePower consumptionConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer networkPower (physics)Reduction (mathematics)Real-time computingReliability engineeringTelecommunicationsBase stationEngineeringWirelessMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we consider 5G networks with Carrier Aggregation (CA). Our aim is to jointly select Component Carriers (CCs) and allocate Resource Blocks (RBs) such that total user throughput is maximized while user power consumption is minimized and Quality of Service (QoS) requirements are met. We formulate the User Equipment (UE) throughput and power consumption in terms of CC and RB indicators and propose a multi-objective optimization problem. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme outperforms the compared techniques by providing approximately 200mW reduction in power consumption while increasing the throughput by 2.7 times for users under short delay constraint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Networking LettersSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207