Los combatientes olvidados en la democracia argentina. Una reseña crítica sobre dos libros del historiador Federico Lorenz
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo crítico analiza dos libros recientemente publicados, casi en simultáneo, por el historiador argentino Federico Lorenz. En uno de ellos estudia una historia sobre la violencia política y el terrorismo de estado en la Argentina de la década de 1970; y en el otro, comprende una historia relacionada con la Guerra de Malvinas y sus secuelas. El primero es: Cenizas que te rodearon al caer. Vidas y muertes de Ana María González, la montonera que mató al jefe de la Policía Federal (Sudamericana, Buenos Aires, 2017, 315 páginas); y el segundo es: La llamada. Historia de un rumor de la posguerra de Malvinas (Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán, 2017, 314 páginas). Me interesa enfocar una interpretación en ambos: la tesis de que la posdictadura o la transición democrática en ese país se erigió sobre un amplio consenso político y social que negó, ocultó o bien marginó a los combatientes “revolucionarios” y veteranos de la “Guerra de Malvinas”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".