MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159602815 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.8319

Naming and Indication in The One Secret That Has Carried

2016· article· en· W3159602815 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ryan McQuaid

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)PoetryReflexive pronounReading (process)Theme (computing)LiteratureSelfPhilosophyAestheticsHistorySociologyLinguisticsPsychologyArtEpistemologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay explores the ways in which Foucaldian indication and naming operate as mediums through with truth, sex, and sujectivities communicate in the poem The CarrieOne Secret That Has Carried by Jason Shinder. The essay examines the position of sexual acts in the poem, and determines that they function as sites of indication from which truth can be procured. These sites of indication operate as privileged spaces of truth within the poem which imply a compulsory body project fro the subject reading them. Self-naming is also explored. The ways that the narrating subject names himself and other spaces/subjects in the poem is examined to elucidate how a healthy/sick binary is generated and how this binary is implemented and enforced in discourse. A theme discussed in connection with these investigations is the pathologizing of the narrating subject of the poem. This discussion centres around what structures inform the subjects reading of himself ans pathologized. As well as how the subject's self-naming operates to effect and consolidate eht epathology to which he is predicated.
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.354
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.011 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207