MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Federated Double Deep Q-learning for Joint Delay and Energy Minimization in IoT networks

2021· preprint· en· W3159610089 on OpenAlexafffund
Sheyda Zarandi, Hina Tabassum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceScalabilityComputationContext (archaeology)Computation offloadingInteger programmingDistributed computingTask (project management)Mathematical optimizationResource allocationEnergy consumptionDeep learningQ-learningMinificationOptimization problemArtificial intelligenceComputer networkEdge computingAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a federated deep reinforcement learning framework to solve a multi-objective optimization problem, where we consider minimizing the expected long-term task completion delay and energy consumption of IoT devices. This is done by optimizing offloading decisions, computation resource allocation, and transmit power allocation. Since the formulated problem is a mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP), we first cast our problem as a multi-agent distributed deep reinforcement learning (DRL) problem and address it using double deep Q-network (DDQN), where the actions are offloading decisions. The immediate cost of each agent is calculated through solving either the transmit power optimization or local computation resource optimization, based on the selected offloading decisions (actions). Then, to enhance the learning speed of IoT devices (agents), we incorporate federated learning (FDL) at the end of each episode. FDL enhances the scalability of the proposed DRL framework, creates a context for cooperation between agents, and minimizes their privacy concerns. Our numerical results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed federated DDQN framework in terms of learning speed compared to federated deep Q network (DQN) and non-federated DDQN algorithms. In addition, we investigate the impact of batch size, network layers, DDQN target network update frequency on the learning speed of the FDL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207