MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159651793 · doi:10.32766/brag.381.791

Ricardo Carvalho Calero e o teatro

2020· article· gl· W3159651793 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Tato-Fontaíña

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín da Real Academia Galega · 2020
Typearticle
Languagegl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGalician and Iberian cultural studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo, a autora fai un percurso polas actividades dramáticas de Ricardo Carvalho Calero. Comeza coa súa primeira obra, escrita en 1934, dentro do programa de modernización e actualización do teatro galego iniciado polas Irmandades da Fala e continuado polo Grupo Nós, a xeración das Vangardas e a do Seminario de Estudos Galegos. Pasa polas obras escritas na soidade da posguerra e os traballos relacionados co teatro escolar en Fingoi, para acabar coas últimas reflexións do autor sobre os pactos da Transición política, en 1980, coa escrita de Os xefes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín da Real Academia GalegaSame topicGalician and Iberian cultural studiesFrench-language works237,207