Impact of Motion Artifact on Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed ECG using a Deterministic Matrix
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early detection of Atrial Fibrillation (AFib) is warranted to reduce the chances of patients developing complications. Compressive sensing (CS) of electrocardiogram (ECG) will facilitate long term monitoring with detection of AFib in the compressed domain eliminating the need for the expensive operation of reconstructing the ECG. This paper presented an AFib detector in the compressed domain and studied the effect of noise on it. ECG records from the Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Database were contaminated with motion artifact from the MIT-BIH Noise Stress Database and compressed to 50%, 75%, and 95% levels. A 100 tree random forest was used to detect AFib in the uncompressed and compressed ECG at different noise levels. The random forest was evaluated using 5-fold cross validation and patient hold-out method. The random forest achieved a maximum of 81.87% F1 score at the 3 dB Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and 75% compression level in cross validation. Changing the SNR to -10 dB reduced the F1 score by 3.25%. The random forest achieved a maximum of 61.03% at 3 dB SNR and on uncompressed ECG in the hold-out test. Changing the SNR to -10 dB reduced the F1 score by 6.55%. The results show that it is possible to detect AFib in the compressed domain with noise impacting the performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it