MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159797549 · doi:10.18192/jpp.v12i0.5498

Political Prisoners in the U.S. Valley of Death

2003· article· en· W3159797549 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zolo Agona Azania

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Prisoners on Prisons · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceCriminologyLawPolitical economySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People who come out of prison can build up the country.Misfortune is a test of people's fidelity.Those who protest at injustice are people of true merit.-HoChiMinh S ome seemingly respectable people enjoy sensational skulduggery of tragic love triangles and detective crime statistics; they find invidious pleasme in revulsion.Executions are used as a burnt offerings, and the condemned are stigmatized as visible targets of hatred and public scorn.The relation between crime and social factors is indisputable.People in free society are intensely angered by downsizing, factory automation, and technologies that have eliminated hundreds of thousands of jobs, leaving only work servicing the rich.They are able to direct some oftheir resentment and pent-up frustrations at the executed prisoner.Thus, capital punishment fulfills its role in a vicious cycle.Most of the people on death rows are social prisoners, who were neither politically conscious, nor politically active prior to their arrest and conviction.Social prisoners are held up as throwaway people and, as such, are ruthlessly fed into the grindingjaws of an inflated, overtaxed, depressed political economy.So the withholding of evidence, or illegally suppressing favomable evidence from people on trial for their lives is no big deal.Every time you open yom mouth to speak and the truth comes out, a growing number of people will despise you.Those in positions of public trust, such as haughty politicians, corrupt police, corporation heads, and the conveyers oflicentious influences in government harbom unrelenting disdain for those who throw light on their questionable dealings.The multi-billion-dollar, actionpacked movie and broadcast industries are fuelled by extreme ravishment.Whether it is comedy, caltoon, drama, or mystelY, orchestrated violence attracts the huge crowds.It is good when bundles of money are raked in as profit.The production and distribution of carnal degradation is justified by the return of vast revenue.Money makes it right.If money cannot be made, then it is bad.Build more prisons, but please leave the corruption alone.What sense does it make for politicians to spend millions of dollars campaigning for public office, work that only pays a salary of about $95,000 per year?Political science has become an art fonn, and professional politicians

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Prisoners on PrisonsSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207