Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the magnetically isolated zigzag chain in KGaCu(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetism of any material depends on its crystal structure. However, two isostructural compounds such as MCuMoO4(OH) (M = Na, K) can have markedly different magnetic properties. Herein, we introduce a new method to describe the linkages between the O-atoms and their bridged Cu2+ ions in order to clearly illustrate the structure-magnetic property relationships. This new method can account for magnetic differences between the two isostructural MCuMoO4(OH) and is further confirmed by the rational design and development of a new compound KGaCu(PO4)2 with different linkages. The title compound crystalized in a space group of P21/c adopts a one-dimensional (1D) magnetically isolated S = 1/2 zigzag chain composed of elongated [CuO6] octahedra via sharing alternately equatorial and skew edges. O atoms at the skew edges bridge the equatorial and axial orbitals of neighbouring Cu2+ ions (denoted EOA), while those at the equatorial edges bridge the equatorial orbitals of Cu2+ ions (EOE). The nearest-neighbour (NN) magnetic coupling of Cu2+ ions with the EOA linkage at 2.821 Å in the title compound is negligible, whereas the NN magnetic coupling of Cu2+ ions with the EOE linkage at 2.974 Å is essential. Therefore, the zigzag chain containing alternating spin-exchange dimers and no-spin-exchange ones is similar in electronic configuration to the dimerization of the quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet. Magnetic investigation of analogous compounds with a 'trans-cis-trans-cis' configuration observed in the title compound may shed light on structural evolutions associated with spin-Peierls (SP) transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".