MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159862377 · doi:10.4000/books.pupvd.29592

La poétique du fragment dans l’œuvre de Georges Perec. Le cas de la Vie mode d’emploi

2002· book-chapter· fr· W3159862377 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Ionela Niculae

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avant même d’ouvrir La Vie mode d’emploi, le lecteur est intrigué par un détail bizarre et inquiétant ; le livre a comme sous-titre, au pluriel : romans. Au seuil de ces 700 pages, on est donc mis en garde sur l’intention d’originalité et de redéfinition du statut de roman, décidément placé sous le signe du fragmentaire. Un simple “s” au centre de la couverture laisse deviner un texte voulu morcelé et éveille chez le lecteur un premier soupçon : Perec considère-t-il roman et fragment comme de...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooksSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207