Detection and Longitudinal Tracking of Pigmented Skin Lesions in 3D Total-Body Skin Textured Meshes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an automated approach to detect and longitudinally track skin lesions on 3D total-body skin surfaces scans. The acquired 3D mesh of the subject is unwrapped to a 2D texture image, where a trained region convolutional neural network (R-CNN) localizes the lesions within the 2D domain. These detected skin lesions are mapped back to the 3D surface of the subject and, for subjects imaged multiple times, the anatomical correspondences among pairs of meshes and the geodesic distances among lesions are leveraged in our longitudinal lesion tracking algorithm. We evaluated the proposed approach using three sources of data. Firstly, we augmented the 3D meshes of human subjects from the public FAUST dataset with a variety of poses, textures, and images of lesions. Secondly, using a handheld structured light 3D scanner, we imaged a mannequin with multiple synthetic skin lesions at selected location and with varying shapes, sizes, and colours. Finally, we used 3DBodyTex, a publicly available dataset composed of 3D scans imaging the colored (textured) skin of 200 human subjects. We manually annotated locations that appeared to the human eye to contain a pigmented skin lesion as well as tracked a subset of lesions occurring on the same subject imaged in different poses. Our results, on test subjects annotated by three human annotators, suggest that the trained R-CNN detects lesions at a similar performance level as the human annotators. Our lesion tracking algorithm achieves an average accuracy of 80% when identifying corresponding pairs of lesions across subjects imaged in different poses. As there currently is no other large-scale publicly available dataset of 3D total-body skin lesions, we publicly release the 10 mannequin meshes and over 25,000 3DBodyTex manual annotations, which we hope will further research on total-body skin lesion analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".