693 Sleep Health in the Young Adult Clinic: A retrospective observational cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The Toronto Academic Pain Medicine Institute (TAPMI) Young Adult Clinic (YAC) was developed to offer transition services for clients aged 17–25 with persistent pain. It was noticed that YAC patients had significant problems with their sleep and the program was expanded in January 2019 by including a sleep medicine specialist for systematic evaluation of sleep health. Long-term sleep disruption has been associated with increase sensitivity to pain, prolonged pain duration, and predicts chronic pain. The degree of pain relief can directly impact the quality and disruption of sleep. Methods After approval from institutional review board, we reviewed YAC medical charts from March 2018 to April 2019 and extracted information pertaining to demographics, chronic pain and sleep. We present here the preliminary data of our multidisciplinary clinic Results 55 medical charts were reviewed which included 40 females, 13 males, 2 nonbinary individuals, with a mean age of 20.3±2.4 years. 53% of the patients had chronic widespread pain. Symptoms of or disorder of sleep were reported in 72.7% of the patients. The various nighttime disorders of sleep were trouble falling asleep, insomnia, problems with sleep initiation, difficulty in maintaining sleep, poor sleep continuity, frequent night awakenings due to pain, restless leg syndrome (RLS), obstructive sleep apnea, parasomnic behavior, circadian rhythm disorder such as delayed sleep phase disorder. As assessed by Epworth Sleepiness scale, 7% of the patients had mild, 7% had moderate and 2% had severe daytime sleepiness. 42% of the youths demonstrated a low self-efficacy score as per Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to measure the severity of depression which showed that 5.5%, 27%, 18%, 14.5%, 22% of the YAC patients suffered from minimal, mild, moderate, moderately-severe and severe depression respectively. The information collected on Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS) suggested that 24%, 29% and 31% were at low, moderate, and high risk respectively in having catastrophizing thoughts and feelings related to pain. There was no statistical difference in the means PSEQ, PHQ-9 and PCS scores of young adults. Conclusion Sleep disturbances may be an important modifiable risk factor for alleviating distress in young adults with chronic pain. Support (if any):
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".