AGENT: the Arabidopsis Gene Regulatory Network Tool for Exploring and Analyzing GRNs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) are complex networks that capture multi-level regulatory events between one or more regulatory macromolecules, such as transcription factors (TFs), and their target genes. Advancements in screening technologies such as enhanced yeast-one-hybrid screens have allowed for high throughput determination of GRNs. However, visualization of GRNs in Arabidopsis has been limited to ad hoc networks and are not interactive. Here, we describe the Arabidopsis GEne Network Tool (AGENT) that houses curated GRNs and provides tools to visualize and explore them. AGENT features include expression overlays, subnetwork motif scanning, and network analysis. We show how to use AGENT’s multiple built-in tools to identify key genes that are involved in flowering and seed development along with identifying temporal multi-TF control of a key transporter in nitrate signaling. AGENT can be accessed at https://bar.utoronto.ca/AGENT .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".