MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3159963640 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab048.045

Obesity, Body Fat Distribution, and Circulating Glutamate Concentrations, A BI-Directional Mendelian Randomization Study

2021· article· en· W3159963640 on OpenAlexaff
Ina Maltais‐Payette, Jérôme Bourgault, Benoît J. Arsenault, André Tchernof

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationWaistInternal medicineBody mass indexMedicineAbdominal obesityEndocrinologyObesityGenome-wide association studyAdipose tissueBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeGeneticsGenetic variantsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Various observational studies have reported that circulating levels of the amino acid glutamate was significantly associated with central fat accumulation in men and women. This is the case in the Framingham Heart Study Generation 3 for waist circumference, in the TwinsUK cohort for trunk fat and in a cohort of 1449 Japanese for visceral adipose tissue area measured by computed tomography. However, whether the association between abdominal adiposity and circulating glutamate is causal, as well as the direction of this association, is unknown. Here, we aimed to determine whether obesity and abdominal obesity were causally associated with circulating glutamate levels. Methods: We used a two-sample bi-directional inverse-variance weighted Mendelian randomization study design (IVW-MR). We derived summary statistics for our exposures and outcomes from published genome-wide association studies from the GIANT consortium (n = 681 275) and blood metabolites (n = 7 804). We identified independent genetic variants (r2 < 0.1) associated with body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRadjBMI, p < 5x10-8) as well as circulating glutamate (p < 5x10-5). Results: We found no causal association between circulating glutamate levels and BMI (beta = 0.082, SE = 0.0413, p = 0.0471) or WHRadjBMI (beta = -0.00106, SE = 0.0401, p = 0.979). However, there was a positive effect of BMI (beta = 0.0608, SE = 0.0150, p = 5.19x10-5) and WHRadjBMI (beta = 0.0701, SE = 0.0198, p = 3.98x10-4) on circulating glutamate level. Conclusion: This Mendelian randomization analysis suggests that obesity and abdominal obesity are causally related to elevated circulating glutamate levels. Glutamate levels are not causally related to adiposity. Whether the downregulation of branched-chain amino acid catabolism in adipose tissue reported in obesity underlies this association should be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→