MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159969062

High-throughput Modular Tissue Engineering and Applications to Scale-up Tissue Constructs

2012· dissertation· en· W3159969062 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Derek N. Voice

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaStrong
KeywordsModular designThroughputTissue engineeringScale (ratio)Computer scienceBiomedical engineeringComputational biologyEngineeringBiologyCartographyProgramming languageGeographyOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new air-shearing technique was designed for the high-throughput production of collagen modules and the assembly of large tissue constructs. >95% of cells embedded in air-sheared modules remained viable after production. Additionally, the module surface could be coated with a confluent monolayer of endothelial cells (ECs). Custom-designed bioreactors (volume > 1 cm3) were built to culture large volumes of modules and enable medium perfusion to the core of packed modular beds. In two separate experiments, this platform was applied to modules containing human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and rat neonatal cardiomyocyte-enriched cells. In both cases, modules fused to form single porous viable tissues. The cardiac tissues were contractile, with a maximum capture rate and excitation threshold of 2.3 + 0.58 Hz and 5.9 + 2.10 V/cm respectively. Efforts were made, with varying success, to create EC-lined pores in tissues by surface seeding modules with ECs prior to loading in bioreactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207