MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3159973538 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1257

3D core kinematics of NGC 6362: central rotation in a dynamically evolved globular cluster

2021· article· en· W3159973538 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. Dalessandro, Silvia Raso, Sebastian Kamann, M. Bellazzini, Enrico Vesperini, Andrea Bellini, G. Beccari

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science FoundationInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaEuropean School of OncologyUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterAstrophysicsCluster (spacecraft)Rotation (mathematics)RADIUSGalaxy clusterPopulationAmplitudeGalaxyStar clusterAstronomyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present a detailed 3D kinematic analysis of the central regions (R < 30 arcsec) of the low mass and dynamically evolved galactic globular cluster (GC) NGC 6362. The study is based on data obtained with ESO-VLT/MUSE used in combination with the adaptive optics module and providing ∼3000 line-of-sight radial velocities, which have been complemented with Hubble Space Telescope proper motions. The quality of the data and the number of available radial velocities allowed us to detect for the first time a significant rotation signal along the line of sight in the cluster core with amplitude of ∼1 km s−1 and with a peak located at only ∼20 arcsec from the cluster centre, corresponding to only ${\sim}10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of the cluster half-light radius. This result is further supported by the detection of a central and significant tangential anisotropy in the cluster innermost regions. This is one of the most central rotation signals ever observed in a GC to date. We also explore the rotational properties of the multiple populations hosted by this cluster and find that Na-rich stars rotate about two times more rapidly than the Na-poor sub-population thus suggesting that the interpretation of the present-day GC properties require a multicomponent chemo-dynamical approach. Both the rotation amplitude and peak position would fit qualitatively the theoretical expectations for a system that lost a significant fraction of its original mass because of the long-term dynamical evolution and interaction with the Galaxy. However, to match the observations more quantitatively further theoretical studies to explore the initial dynamical properties of the cluster are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→