MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

John Wesley's Empowered Regimen

2021· article· en· W3159975987 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joy L. Arroyo

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegimenDenialSanctificationEmpowermentMental healthPsychologySociologyMedicinePsychotherapistTheologyInternal medicineLawPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT John Wesley advocated seeking and maintaining physical and mental health through a disciplined daily regimen. Several scholars have written about this, and some have connected it to entire sanctification. Yet, no one has considered how Wesley envisioned God's empowerment of this regimen. This practical theology article claims that Wesley's vision of God's empowerment provides an important model for addressing clergy health problems. Wesley linked the daily regimen to sanctification because the regimen increases self-control. More specifically, Wesley described a nutritious diet and waking early as self-denial, a general means of grace, and temperance, a fruit of the Spirit. These characterizations suggest that a daily health regimen is a cooperative endeavour between humans and God.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicMormonism, Religion, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207