The Ongoing Process of Teacher Identity: A Qualitative Study on One Early Childhood Induction Teacher`s Experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focused on recognizing how an induction teacher constructs and reconstructs particular meanings in her teaching and how she shapes her sense of self as an early childhood education teacher in her everyday life. A case study approach was used to conduct this in-depth investigation of an early childhood education induction teacher in Korea and how she perceived herself as a newcomer in the teaching world. The participant in the study was Ujin, a Korean woman in her twenties, who had fewer than two years of early childhood teaching experience. The findings of this study describe the extensive journey that this early childhood education induction teacher took to find her own way in the world of teaching. Ujin demonstrated enthusiasm and passion for becoming a teacher when she chose early childhood education as a major. However, the events she experienced in the real teaching world were different and unique according to the given context, and she continuously negotiated her teacher identity from moment to moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it