MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160018609 · doi:10.14428/rcompro.vi12.61513

« C’est tellement plus facile d’obtenir des confidences sur un oreiller » : le mythe de la salope chez les journalistes sportives québécoises

2021· article· fr· W3160018609 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Communication & professionnalisation · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les journalistes sportives évoluent dans un milieu hétérocentré où les relations qu’elles entretiennent avec les athlètes sont scrutées à la loupe. Dans cet article, nous verrons qu’entre 1970 et 2015, le mythe de la « salope », soit l’idée répandue selon laquelle les journalistes sportives choisiraient ce métier dans le but d’entretenir des relations intimes et sexuelles avec les sportifs, s’est peu à peu implanté au Québec. Ce mythe crée un double standard entre ce qui est perçu comme une pratique légitime pour les hommes et ce qui est acceptable pour les femmes, en plus de faire des journalistes sportives les gardiennes de la moralité dans un environnement où les demandes à leur égard sont contradictoires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it