High-order accurate direct numerical simulation of flow over a MTU-T161 low pressure turbine blade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations and wind tunnel testing have become the go-to tools for industrial design of Low-Pressure Turbine (LPT) blades. However, there is also an emerging interest in use of scale-resolving simulations, including Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS). These could generate insight and data to underpin development of improved RANS models for LPT design. Additionally, they could underpin a virtual LPT wind tunnel capability, that is cheaper, quicker, and more data-rich than experiments. The current study applies PyFR, a Python based Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver, to fifth-order accurate petascale DNS of compressible flow over a three-dimensional MTU-T161 LPT blade with diverging end walls at a Reynolds number of 200,000 on an unstructured mesh with over 11 billion degrees-of-freedom per equation. Various flow metrics, including isentropic Mach number distribution at mid-span, surface shear, and wake pressure losses are compared with available experimental data and found to be in agreement. Subsequently, a more detailed analysis of various flow features is presented. These include the separation/transition processes on both the suction and pressure sides of the blade, end-wall vortices, and wake evolution at various span-wise locations. The results, which constitute one of the largest and highest-fidelity CFD simulations ever conducted, demonstrate the potential of high-order accurate GPU-accelerated CFD as a tool for delivering industrial DNS of LPT blades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".