MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160048981 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22994-4

Marine snow morphology illuminates the evolution of phytoplankton blooms and determines their subsequent vertical export

2021· article· en· W3160048981 on OpenAlexafffund
Emilia Trudnowska, Léo Lacour, Mathieu Ardyna, Andreas Rogge, Jean‐Olivier Irisson, Anya M. Waite, Marcel Babin, Lars Stemmann

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsTakuvik Joint International LaboratoryDalhousie UniversityUniversité LavalMakivik Corporation
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundOcean Frontier InstituteSorbonne UniversitéInstitut Polaire Français Paul Emile VictorCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAgence Nationale de la RechercheCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaUniversité LavalArcticNetNarodowe Centrum NaukiEuropean Commission
KeywordsMarine snowPhytoplanktonSnowEnvironmental scienceArcticOceanographyMorphology (biology)Algal bloomEcologyGeologyBiologyMeteorologyGeographyNutrientWater columnPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The organic carbon produced in the ocean's surface by phytoplankton is either passed through the food web or exported to the ocean interior as marine snow. The rate and efficiency of such vertical export strongly depend on the size, structure and shape of individual particles, but apart from size, other morphological properties are still not quantitatively monitored. With the growing number of in situ imaging technologies, there is now a great possibility to analyze the morphology of individual marine snow. Thus, automated methods for their classification are urgently needed. Consequently, here we present a simple, objective categorization method of marine snow into a few ecologically meaningful functional morphotypes using field data from successive phases of the Arctic phytoplankton bloom. The proposed approach is a promising tool for future studies aiming to integrate the diversity, composition and morphology of marine snow into our understanding of the biological carbon pump.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207