MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160075133

부동산 경제활동에 있어 주택시장의 거시적 분석과 그 과제

2008· article· ko· W3160075133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
정윤

Bibliographic record

Venue부동산학보 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHouse priceReal estateQuarter (Canadian coin)EnforcementGovernment (linguistics)EconomicsMarket researchBusinessFinancePolitical scienceMarketingEconometricsLawGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to the Macroscopic Analyses of Domestic House Market evaluate the Real Estate Economic and Domestic Howse Market in Korea. (2) RESEARCH METHOD Through the former research reviews, the direction and the flow of study were set up and selected the list of theory for reviewing. This study was focused on house prices and Governmental house policies analysis. This study used to the Macroscopic Analyses (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS In the results of this rearch, the most important problem of the house price is not analysed in detail. 2. RESULTS There are a lot of doubts on how much governmental house policies are effective, because the government intervenes in markets everytime house price is instable Most researchers judge effects on the price, dividing policies in go those before as well as after enforcement, guess police effects, constructing modes on the target at measured indexes, and put into practical use the materials such as GDP, classifying them with quarter years. But, the house price is not analysed in detail. This thesis aims at finding suggestion and offering proper direction headed for in the future under the mentioned subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue부동산학보Same topicAdvanced Statistical Modeling TechniquesFrench-language works237,207