From granulation-degranulation mechanisms to fuzzy rule-based models: Augmentation of granular-based models with a double fuzzy clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we develop a novel clustering with double fuzzy factors to enhance the performance of the granulation-degranulation mechanism, with which a fuzzy rule-based model is designed and demonstrated to be an enhanced one. The essence of the developed scheme is to optimize the construction of the information granules so as to eventually improve the performance of the fuzzy rule-based models. In the design process, a prototype matrix is defined to express the Fuzzy C-Means based granulation-degranulation mechanism in a clear manner. We assume that the dataset degranulated from the formed information granules is equal to the original numerical dataset. Then, a clustering method with double fuzzy factors is derived. We also present a detailed mathematical proof for the proposed approach. Subsequently, on the basis of the enhanced version of the granulation-degranulation mechanism, we design a granular fuzzy model. The whole design is mainly focused on an efficient application of the fuzzy clustering to build information granules used in fuzzy rule-based models. Comprehensive experimental studies demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it