From granulation-degranulation mechanisms to fuzzy rule-based models: Augmentation of granular-based models with a double fuzzy clustering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we develop a novel clustering with double fuzzy factors to enhance the performance of the granulation-degranulation mechanism, with which a fuzzy rule-based model is designed and demonstrated to be an enhanced one. The essence of the developed scheme is to optimize the construction of the information granules so as to eventually improve the performance of the fuzzy rule-based models. In the design process, a prototype matrix is defined to express the Fuzzy C-Means based granulation-degranulation mechanism in a clear manner. We assume that the dataset degranulated from the formed information granules is equal to the original numerical dataset. Then, a clustering method with double fuzzy factors is derived. We also present a detailed mathematical proof for the proposed approach. Subsequently, on the basis of the enhanced version of the granulation-degranulation mechanism, we design a granular fuzzy model. The whole design is mainly focused on an efficient application of the fuzzy clustering to build information granules used in fuzzy rule-based models. Comprehensive experimental studies demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".