A modified two-leaf light use efficiency model for improving the simulation of GPP using a radiation scalar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A TL-LUE model modified with a radiation scalar (RTL-LUE) is developed in this paper. The same maximum LUE is used for both sunlit and shaded leaves, and the difference in LUE between sunlit and shaded leaf groups is determined by the same radiation scalar. The RTL-LUE model was calibrated and validated at global 169 FLUXNET eddy covariance (EC) sites. Results indicate that although GPP simulations from the TL-LUE model match well with the EC GPP, the RTL-LUE model can further improve the simulation, for half-hour, 8-day, and yearly time scales. The TL-LUE model tends to overestimate GPP under conditions of high incoming photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), because the radiation-independent LUE values for both sunlit and shaded leaves are only suitable for low-medium (e.g. average) incoming PAR conditions. The errors in the RTL-LUE model show lower sensitivity to PAR, and its GPP simulations can better track the diurnal and seasonal variations of EC GPP by alleviating the overestimation at noon and growing seasons associated with the TL-LUE model. This study demonstrates the necessity of considering a radiation scalar in GPP simulation in LUE models even if the first-order effect of radiation is already considered through differentiating sunlit and shaded leaves. The simple RTL-LUE developed in this study would be a useful alternative to complex process-based models for global carbon cycle research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".