MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160360104 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.055805

New measurement of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c.m.</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>323</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> keV resonance in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ne</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> reaction

2021· article· lv· W3160360104 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Williams, P. Adsley, B. Davids, U. Greife, D. A. Hutcheon, J. Karpesky, A. Lennarz, M. Lovely, C. Ruiz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyNorth Carolina State UniversityTRIUMFU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At temperatures below 0.1 GK, the $^{19}\mathrm{F}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$ reaction is the only breakout path out of the CNO cycle. Experimental studies of this reaction are challenging from a technical perspective due to copious $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray background from the far stronger $^{19}\mathrm{F}(p,\ensuremath{\alpha})^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction channel. Here, we present the first inverse kinematics study of the $^{19}\mathrm{F}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$ reaction, in which we measure the strength of the 323-keV resonance. We find a strength value of $\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\gamma}=3.{3}_{\ensuremath{-}0.9}^{+1.1}$ meV, which is a factor of two larger than the most recent previous study. The discrepancy is likely the result of a direct to ground state transition which previous studies were not sensitive to. We also observe the transition to the first ${2}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ state, which has not been observed for this resonance in previous studies. A new thermonuclear reaction rate is calculated and compared with the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.011
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0130.013
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207