MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160372375 · doi:10.3934/mbe.2021206

Dynamics induced by environmental stochasticity in a phytoplankton-zooplankton system with toxic phytoplankton

2021· article· en· W3160372375 on OpenAlexaff
He Liu, Chuanjun Dai, Hengguo Yu, Qing Guo, Jianbing Li, Aimin Hao, Jun Kikuchi, Min Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Biosciences & Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonZooplanktonPlanktonEnvironmental scienceMarine ecosystemExtinction (optical mineralogy)Biomass (ecology)EcosystemEcologyBiologyOceanographyNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental stochasticity and toxin-producing phytoplankton (TPP) are the key factors that affect the aquatic ecosystems. To investigate the effects of environmental stochasticity and TPP on the dynamics of plankton populations, a stochastic phytoplankton-zooplankton system with two TPP is studied theoretically and numerically in this paper. Theoretically, we first prove that the system possesses a unique and global positive solution with positive initial values, and then derive some sufficient conditions guaranteeing the extinction and persistence in the mean of the system. Significantly, it is shown that the system has a stationary distribution when toxin liberation rate reaches some a critical value. Additionally, numerical analysis shows that the white noise can affect the survival of plankton populations directly. Furthermore, it has been observed that the increasing one toxin liberation rate can increase the survival chance of phytoplankton and reduce the biomass of zooplankton, but the combined effects of two liberation rates on the changes in plankton populations are stronger than that of controlling any one of the two TPP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Biosciences & EngineeringSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207