MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160396447 · doi:10.1089/vim.2021.0075

Herd Immunity Against COVID-19: More Questions Than Answers

2021· article· en· W3160396447 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rodney S. Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueViral Immunology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Herd immunity2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyImmunityBiologyPandemicImmunologyMedicineImmune systemVaccinationInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseOutbreakPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viral ImmunologyVol. 34, No. 4 EditorialHerd Immunity Against COVID-19: More Questions Than AnswersRodney S. RussellRodney S. RussellAddress correspondence to: Dr. Rodney S. Russell, BioMedical Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Dr., St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 5S7, Canada E-mail Address: [email protected]BioMedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:13 May 2021https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2021.0075AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail View article"Herd Immunity Against COVID-19: More Questions Than Answers." Viral Immunology, 34(4), pp. 211–212FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 34Issue 4May 2021 InformationCopyright 2021, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Rodney S. Russell.Herd Immunity Against COVID-19: More Questions Than Answers.Viral Immunology.May 2021.211-212.http://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2021.0075Published in Volume: 34 Issue 4: May 13, 2021PDF download

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueViral ImmunologySame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207