Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Imagined EncounterI'm out of makeup.Well, mascara.And eyeliner.And blush.I have a wedding later today -the Portuguese kind -and I can't be seen au naturel.Immediately, a future conversation with my tia pops up; she will say: what happened to your face?I will respond with: nothing, Tia, it's just my face.My aunt will then say: but in the photos, on the machine, you look so nice.I say: I didn't have time to look at my face.I suddenly realize I've given away too much information.My tia says: You don't have time?And she launches into a monologue about how young people only want to hang out, and go to restaurants, and not make their beds.It goes on for about five minutes.I say goodbye and run away, missing the wedding festivities.Every Portuguese girl plays out conversations with various matriarchs in order to avoid scrutiny, or at least to minimize it.This policing of behavior is still a remnant of the Salazar regime, when secret spies populated even the smallest of towns.I'd bet money that Portuguese aunts invented the kind of surveillance Michel Foucault talks about -the kind that turns everyone into policing each other's behavior.The paradox here is that my aunt still thinks that Portugal has remained the same since she left in the 1950s.My tia upholds behaviors from over 50 years ago, and expects that Luso-Canadians maintain Salazar's ideals and policies.This was precisely Salazar's aim -to keep people incapable of seeing the power structures controlling them so as to instead observe their own family, friends, and neighbors.Keep them looking sideways.It's not all bad though, gathering information through surveillance is kind of like the predecessor to a neighborhood block watch.My plan today, on my cousin's wedding day, though, is to avoid being compared with all the nice Portuguese girls, women with successful careers like Nelly Furtado, Mariza, and Cristina Ferreira (no relation to me -I swear).I decide that, instead of this, I'll arm myself with makeup.My glamorized face will perhaps distract my Tia.I walk to the pharmacy in my neighborhood, Commercial Drive.I was born in Vancouver, Canada and this neighborhood epitomizes my experiences -I know
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".