MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160463998 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.024

Configuration and Governance of Dynamic Secure SDN

2021· article· en· W3160463998 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammed Alabbad, Ridha Khédri

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsForwarding planeComputer scienceRouting control planeSoftware-defined networkingPlane (geometry)Distributed computingSegmentationComputer networkTopology (electrical circuits)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software Defined Networks (SDN) is a networking paradigm that separates the control plane from the forwarding plane. There is little research on structuring the SDN data plane for security. The Robust Network and Segmentation Algorithm (RNS) is an algorithm based on Product Family Algebra (PFA) that implements layered defence and segmentation strategies to segment resources towards designing secure networks. In this paper, we present an additional plane in charge of the configuration and governance of SDN data planes that we call Dynamic Configuration and Governance (DCG) plane. It is intended to give agility to dynamic networks. It implements the RNS algorithm in SDN environment. Moreover, we propose and suggest three architectures that use DCG plane. Then we assess the three architectures. The assessment results identify an architecture that is suitable for dynamic networks and another for networks that are more stable regarding changes to policy and network topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207