MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160475574 · doi:10.18280/ts.380213

Machine Learning-Based Emotional Recognition in Surveillance Video Images in the Context of Smart City Safety

2021· article· en· W3160475574 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Pan, Zhaojun Zhou, Qingjie Liu, Xiaoye Sun, Fuming Chen, Wei Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Facial recognition systemOptical flowComputer visionFace (sociological concept)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionFace detectionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effective extraction of deep information from surveillance video lays the basis for smart city safety. However, the surveillance video images contain complex targets, whose expression changes are difficult to capture. The traditional face expression recognition methods or sentiment analysis algorithms have a poor application effect. Based on machine learning (ML), this paper explores the emotional recognition in surveillance video images in the context of smart city safety. Firstly, the potential textures of surveillance video images were extracted under multi-order double cross (MODC) mode, and the optical flow features of facial expressions were detected in these images. Next, a facial expression recognition model was constructed based on the DeepID convolutional neural network (CNN), and an emotional semantic space was established for the face images in surveillance video. The proposed method was proved effective through experiments. The research results provide a reference for emotional recognition in images of other fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207