MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160523492 · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac00f4

Communication—Design of LiNi <sub>0.2</sub> Mn <sub>0.2</sub> Co <sub>0.2</sub> Fe <sub>0.2</sub> Ti <sub>0.2</sub> O <sub>2</sub> as a High-Entropy Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries Guided by Machine Learning

2021· article· en· W3160523492 on OpenAlex
James Sturman, Chae-Ho Yim, Elena A. Baranova, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOffice of Energy Research and Development
KeywordsCathodeElectrochemistryMaterials scienceTransition metalBattery (electricity)ElectrodeLithium (medication)Chemical stabilityChemical engineeringChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsPhysical chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of “high-entropy” materials in electrodes is an emerging strategy to improve the stability and electrochemical properties of lithium-ion batteries. This study reports the machine learning-driven discovery of a high-entropy LiNi 0.2 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 Fe 0.2 Ti 0.2 O 2 layered oxide cathode. Battery testing reveals a good initial capacity (160 mAh g −1 ) with exceptional stability up to 4.4 V. These materials are a promising way to expand the design space of cathode candidates while using inexpensive transition metals. However, further optimization of these materials is needed to improve battery performance relative to traditional cathodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it