MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 16594: Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiography: Evaluation of Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation (Code Study)

2018· article· en· W3160659583 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriela Paixão, Luis Gustavo Silva e Silva, Paulo R. Gomes, Milton Ferreira, Derick M. Oliveira, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Jamil S. Nascimento, Gustavo Cardoso, Rodrigo Martins de Araujo, Bruno Santos, Jéssica A. Canazart, Leonardo Bonisson Ribeiro

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMilton District Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationElectrocardiographyCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Telehealth system is an important tool to improve access and quality to health assistance.Large electrocardiogram (ECG) databases, linked to mortality or hospitalization data, can be useful in determining the prognostic value of ECG markers. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a public health problem with increasing prevalence as the population ages, associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Hypothesis: Evaluate the association between the presence of AF with overall and cardiovascular mortality in a large electronic cohort of primary care patients of Minas Gerais. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study. Patients over 16 years old who performed digital electrocardiograms by Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais from 2013 to 2016 were assessed. A probabilistic linkage between data from the national mortality information system and our ECG database was made. Clinical data were self-reported, and ECGs were interpreted by a team of trained cardiologists and automatic software (Glasgow and Minnesota).The diagnosis of AF was considered if there was concordance between the cardiologist′s report and one of the automatic systems. In cases of disagreement, ECGs were reviewed manually.Only the first ECG made was analysed. To assess the relation between AF and mortality, Cox regression was used, adjusted by age, sex and clinical conditions. Results: From a dataset of 1,773,689 patients, 1,075,531 were included. The mean age was 51.4 years, 40.5% male.The prevalence of AF was 1.15%. There were 2.9% deaths for all causes in 2.69 years of mean follow up. In univariate analysis, AF was a risk factor for death from all causes (HR 6.98, 95%CI 6.68-7.28). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, AF remained an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (HR 2.49; 95% CI 2.39 - 2.61). AF was also a predictor of risk for cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for age, sex and clinical conditions (HR 2.35, 95% CI 2.01-2.73). In multivariate analysis by sex, adjusted for age and comorbidities, AF women had higher risk of death for all causes (HR 3.06; 95% CI 2.86-3.26) than men (HR 2.18; 95% CI 2.06-2.32). There were no difference between sex in cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.34; 95% CI 2.01-2.73 for male sex e HR 2.49; 95% CI 2.14-2.90 for female). Conclusions: AF was a strong predictor of mortality for all causes and cardiovascular mortality in primary care population with increased risk in women for deaths for all cause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207