MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160687653 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20035299

Importance of Teat Canal Closure and Other Risk Factors On Dry Period Intramammary Infections

2003· article· en· W3160687653 on OpenAlexaff
R.T. Dingwell, K.E. Leslie, Leo L. Timms, D.F. Kelton, Y.H. Schukken

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUdderMedicineMastitisIce calvingDentistryBiologyLactationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the first few weeks after drying-off, and then again immediately prior to calving, cows are at increased risk for developing new intramammary infections (IMI). Research supports that this susceptibility is related to variations in the teat streak canal as well as inherent biochemical and cellular changes occurring in the udder. The time in which the udder is most resistant to dry-period infections is when it has become fully involuted, and when each quarter has formed a natural teat streak canal keratin plug which acts as a physical barrier to close the teat canal. Recent research has been published demonstrating that not all quarters become closed by the teat canal keratin plug, and that dry period clinical mastitis is more likely to occur in quarters that do not close. In addition, products administered at drying-off which act as an inert physical barrier to ensure teat canal closure during the dry period ( OrbeSeal®) have been shown to be efficacious in preventing new IMI. Hence, risk factors associated with teat canal closure would be important to identify.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207