Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on an instability arising in sub-surface, laterally sheared geostrophic flows. When the lateral shear of a horizontal flow in geostrophic balance has a sign opposite to the Coriolis parameter and exceeds it in magnitude, embedded perturbations are subjected to inertial instability, albeit modified by viscosity. When the perturbation arises from the surface of the fluid, the initial response is akin to a Stokes problem, with an initial flow aligned with the initial perturbation. The perturbation then grows quasi-inertially, rotation deflecting the velocity vector, which adopts a well-defined angle with the mean flow, and viscous stresses, transferring horizontal momentum downward. The combination of rotational and viscous effects in the dynamics of inertial instability prompts us to call this process “Ekman-inertial instability.” While the perturbation initially grows super-inertially, the growth rate then becomes sub-inertial, eventually tending back to the inertial value. The same process repeats downward as time progresses. Ekman-inertial transport aligns with the asymptotic orientation of the flow and grows exactly inertially with time once the initial disturbance has passed. Because of the strongly super-inertial initial growth rate, this instability might compete favourably against other instabilities arising in ocean fronts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".