Regulación En Responsabilidad Social Empresarial En La Hotelería De Colombia (Regulation on Corporate Social Responsibility at the Hotels of Colombia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: Actualmente, el turismo y particularmente la hoteleria representan un sector que muestra un comportamiento dinamico en Colombia y el mundo. Esto se ha evidenciado en el incremento de los gastos derivados del turismo receptivo; sin embargo, esta dinamica de crecimiento no se ha equiparado con la asuncion de acciones de responsabilidad social empresarial (RSE) por parte de los hoteles. Ademas, en los ultimos anos han venido apareciendo iniciativas regulativas que pretenden guiar el comportamiento de los hoteles y otro tipo de organizaciones en este sentido. Por ende, este articulo busca contribuir a la reflexion en cuanto a la RSE de los hoteles en Colombia, para lo cual se evidencian los resultados de una investigacion cualitativa a partir del metodo de estudio de caso que caracterizo comparativamente de manera sintetica las principales iniciativas regulativas y posteriormente desarrollo un analisis critico a partir del analisis del discurso y la perspectiva de la Escuela de Montreal. English Abstract: Nowadays, tourism and particularly hospitality is a sector that has shown a dynamic behavior in Colombia and the world. This has been evidenced in the increase in expenses derived from receptive tourism, however, this growth dynamic has not been equated with the assumption of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) actions by hotels. Also, in recent years regulatory initiatives have been appearing, which aim to guide the behavior of hotels and other organizations in this topic. Thus, this article aims to contribute the reflection on csr hotels in Colombia, evidencing the results of a qualitative research based on case study method that characterized the main regulatory initiatives synthetically and later developed a critical analysis based on discourse analysis and the perspective of HEC Montreal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".