Four-dimensional imaging and free-energy analysis of sudden pore-filling events in wicking of yarns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What are the mechanisms at play in the spontaneous imbibition dynamics in polyethylene terephthalate filament yarns at pore scale? Processes at pore scale such as waiting times between the filling of two neighboring pores, as observed in special irregular porous media, like yarns, may overrule the predicted behavior by well-known laws such as Washburn's law. While the imbibition physics are well known, classic models like Washburn's law cannot explain the dynamics observed for yarns. The stepwise dynamics is discussed in terms of the interplay of thermodynamic free energy and viscous dissipation. Time-resolved synchrotron x-ray microtomography documents water filling at pore scale. Spontaneous imbibition in yarns is characterized by a series of fast pore-filling events separated by long periods of low flux. Four-dimensional imaging allows the extraction of interface areas at the boundaries between water, air, and polymer and the calculation of free-energy evolution. It is found that the waiting periods correspond to quasistable water configurations of almost vanishing free-energy gradient. The distributions of pore filling event sizes and waiting times spread over several orders of magnitude, resulting in the pronounced stepwise uptake dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".