The effects of glacial-interglacial loading on the 3D pore pressure evolution in sedimentary basins: case study from the Central European Basin System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study deals with modelling the distribution of the subsurface pore pressure in space and the respective evolution in time in response to variations in hydromechanical surface loading during a full glacial-interglacial cycle. The aim here is to better understand (i) the feedback mechanisms between the atmosphere and solid earth components, and (ii) to which degree this coupling might be relevant for subsurface hydromechanical modelling studies. The study area is the Central European Basin System (CEBS) in northern and Central Europe and state-of-the-art ice reconstructions for the last glacial-interglacial period have been used to model the surface hydromechanical loading conditions. Thereby, investigations on how transient ice coverage influences the pore pressure distribution with depth and over time within a heterogeneous sedimentary cover were carried out. The subsurface beneath the CEBS consists of more than 10 km thick sediments, which have been heavily restructured by salt movements during the whole Mesozoic evolution. Our 3D geological model resolves all major sedimentary and crustal domains, and we relied on the GLAC1-D (1.0 degree longitude by 0.5 degree latitude spatial resolution) ice sheet chronology. Starting from ice-free initial conditions, transient simulation runs are performed (hydraulic vs hydromechanical) which cover the entire last glacial cycle, i.e. encompassing 122ka BP till present day conditions. Results are discussed in terms of pore pressure evolution over time and space. The focus will lie on quantifying subsurface conditions favourable to the establishment and maintenance of overpressure evolution and the related equilibration time within the sedimentary pile. We also investigate how these transient conditions influence the subsurface hydrodynamics, showcasing representative time steps during the evolution of the system. We will finally attempt to quantify the memory effect of such loading conditions on the basin-wide hydromechanics, a feedback mechanism that has been neglected so far in 3D subsurface studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".