MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3160806062 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2021-0058

The Hamiltonian of <i>f</i>(<i>R</i>) gravity

2021· article· en· W3160806062 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Faisal Amin Yassein Abdelmohssin, Osman M.H. El Mekki

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMathematical physicsScalar curvatureHamiltonian (control theory)f(R) gravityRicci curvatureConjugate pointsCurvatureScalar fieldClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisQuantum gravityMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive conjugate momenta variable tensors and the Hamiltonian equation of the source-free f(R) gravity from first principles using the Legendre transformation of these conjugate momenta variable tensors, conjugate coordinates variables — fundamental metric tensor and its first ordinary partial derivatives with respect to space–time coordinates and second ordinary partial derivatives with respect to space–time coordinates — and the Lagrangian of the f(R) gravity. Interpreting the derived Hamiltonian as the energy of the f(R) gravity we have shown that it vanishes for linear Lagrangians in Ricci scalar curvature without source (e.g., Einstein–Hilbert Lagrangian without matter fields), which is the same result obtained using the stress–energy tensor equation derived from variation of the matter field Lagrangian density. The resulting Hamiltonian equation forbids any negative power law model in the dependence of the f(R) gravity on Ricci scalar curvature: f(R) = αR–r, where r and α are positive real numbers; it also forbids any polynomial equation that contains terms with negative powers of the Ricci scalar curvature including a constant term, in which cases the Hamiltonian function in the Ricci scalar and therefore the energy of the f(R) gravity would attain a negative value and would not be bounded from below. The restrictions imposed by the non-negative Hamiltonian have far-reaching consequences as a result of applying f(R) gravity to the study of black holes and the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker model in cosmology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→