MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Migration to the Next Generation of Networks Based on Digital Annealing

2021· article· en· W3160827123 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Javad-Kalbasi, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceExploitQuadratic unconstrained binary optimizationOptimization problemNode (physics)Distributed computingNetwork topologyMathematical optimizationComputer networkEngineeringAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Networks are frequently changing due to new technologies. The growing demand for bandwidth is forcing many carriers to migrate their existing network to a network with a new technology in order to increase network performance. Telecommunication companies are looking for optimization algorithms to efficiently manage their network migration. In this paper, the network migration problem is considered as a set of circuit migration problems in which two technicians simultaneously migrate the two ends of a circuit in order to minimize the total accumulated sites in-service and total technician travels. While total accumulated sites in-service indicates how fast the sites can be upgraded during the migration process, total technician travels estimates the required cost. We first formulate our target problem as a constrained binary quadratic program which is NP-hard in general. Our approach for solving the derived optimization problem is based on converting it to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem (QUBO) using the penalty method. Subsequently, we exploit Digital Annealer which is a massively parallel hardware architecture to minimize the derived QUBO. To evaluate our proposed method, we study extensive network migration instances on the 75-node CONUS network topology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207