Reconstruction of Complex Roof Semantic Structures from 3D Point Clouds Using Local Convexity and Consistency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) building models are closely related to human activities in urban environments. Due to the variations in building styles and complexity in roof structures, automatically reconstructing 3D buildings with semantics and topology information still faces big challenges. In this paper, we present an automated modeling approach that can semantically decompose and reconstruct the complex building light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds into simple parametric structures, and each generated structure is an unambiguous roof semantic unit without overlapping planar primitive. The proposed method starts by extracting roof planes using a multi-label energy minimization solution, followed by constructing a roof connection graph associated with proximity, similarity, and consistency attributes. Furthermore, a progressive decomposition and reconstruction algorithm is introduced to generate explicit semantic subparts and hierarchical representation of an isolated building. The proposed approach is performed on two various datasets and compared with the state-of-the-art reconstruction techniques. The experimental modeling results, including the assessment using the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) benchmark LiDAR datasets, demonstrate that the proposed modeling method can efficiently decompose complex building models into interpretable semantic structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".