MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160846614 · doi:10.1017/9781316981238.012

Review of Random Variables and Processes

2018· other· en· W3160846614 on OpenAlexaff
Nicola Da Dalt, Ali Sheikholeslami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Random variableReading (process)Computer scienceStochastic processRandom noiseMathematicsCalculus (dental)Theoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmLinguisticsStatisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This appendix reviews in a very compact form the basic concepts of random variables and random processes for the purpose of understanding jitter and phase noise. The goal is not to provide a thorough treatment, but rather to help the reader in recalling the definitions and the meanings of some of the most useful and common concepts. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the basic concepts of probability. Although not strictly necessary, it is beneficial that the reader has been previously exposed to the theory of random variables and random processes, as can be found in a typical graduate university class. For further reading, or an in-depth analysis of the concepts, such specialized textbooks as [1], [13], [129], and [105] can be consulted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207